Comparative analysis of organic natural life and motor vehicle life
The conclusion of comparative analysis of M.L and W.L
Compared with M.F, which relies mainly on motor vehicles, W.F, which focuses on walking, has greater benefits from the perspective of the improvement of human living quality and the long-term development of cities and towns.Cities like Cheng County.
Names Explanation
M.L（Private Motor Vehicle Life）；Automobile living town is a town where residents mainly travel by private motor vehicles
W.L:Organic natural life town is a town dominated by organic natural life.It refers to cities and towns where residents mainly travel slowly.Travel modes include chronic modes such as cycling and walking, as well as broad pedestrian modes connecting different urban areas with different forms of public transportation tools;
A.B: Advantage Benefit;
N.B:Negative Benefit；
D.S:,Direct and short-term benefits of residents；
P.L:Public and long-term benefits of citys and towns;
I.C:(Inside City) Private Motor Vehicle Life in inside city；
O.C:(Onside City)Private Motor Vehicle Life in Onside city，
D.W.L:It refers to the urban regional scale within the convenient and comfortable walking distance. The walking distance of daily life is no more than 500 meters, and the overall regional scale is no more than 3 kilometers.
B.W.L：It refers to the pedestrian travel mode connecting different urban areas with different forms of public transportation tools, whether it is the organic natural lifestyle in the area or the organic natural living space in a broad sense,
W.L：Organic natural living town is a town dominated by organic natural life, which refers to the town dominated by slow travel. The travel modes include chronic modes such as cycling and walking. At the same time, it also includes the generalized pedestrian travel mode connecting different urban areas with different forms of public transportation tools;
Automobile living town
The automobile living town is the town where residents mainly travel by private motor vehicles. It mainly refers to the town where residents highly rely on the lifestyle of traveling by private cars. From the perspective of urban space, it includes the living range of IC (inside city) and O.C (outside City) in the inner city.Both inner and outer cities include in the research here.
The full name of the so-called I.C (inside city) can be interpreted as an inner urban area dominated by private motor vehicle life, that is, the urban roads in high-density urban areas are the urban areas where the utilization rate of private motor vehicles reaches more than 60% (the average plot ratio of high-density urban plots is greater than 1). The above indicators highlight the two indicators of high density and utilization. The most typical cities, such as Los Angeles and Detroit in the United States, are lack of public transport in the urban area, where urban residents are highly dependent on private motor vehicles.
The full name of the so-called O.C (onside city) can be interpreted as the outer urban area dominated by private motor vehicle life in onside City, that is, the urban roads outside the low-density urban area are cities with the utilization rate of private motor vehicles reaching more than 60% (the average plot ratio of low-density urban plots is less than 0.6). Generally speaking, the driving time in residents' daily life is no more than 15 minutes. The above indicators highlight the two indicators :high density and utilization rate. The most typical cities include the Bay Area in San Francisco, San Jose, Irvine in Greater Los Angeles, Southern California and orange County.
|
•Description of analysis diagram It can be seen from the comparative analysis, in terms of scores, the gap between the beneficial and negative indicators of the urban life mode M.L dominated by automobile and the life mode W.L dominated by organic and natural life is very obvious. It can be seen that the total score of M.L is - 13 and the total score of W.L is 24, with a difference of 37 points. In the benefit analysis of D.S, the score of W.L is 4 points higher than that of M.L. But the score of P.L is 16 points higher . In the negative analysis of D. S, the negative score of M.L is 5 points higher than that of W.L, but the negative score of P.L is 12 points higher.
Analysis: To more accurately weigh the importance of organic and natural life elements, we divide the lifestyle of urban residents into two categories: the lifestyle of urban residents dominated by private motor vehicles, hereinafter referred to as ML (Private Motor Vehicle Life) and the lifestyle dominated by organic and natural life, hereinafter referred to as WL (Walking Life). We compared and analyzed the direct and short-term A.B (advantage benefit), N.B (negative benefit) ,public and long-term A.B and N.B of these two lifestyles. |
Through analysis, we can see that the benefits of the urban living system dominated by private motor vehicles are mostly reflected in the effectiveness of private life in micro and short-term aspects. But the lack of public benefits is more serious, even opposite to public benefits.Most of the life systems dominated by organic and natural lifestyles are reflected in public benefits. To achieve these public benefits, private micro and short-term effects are relatively obvious. At the same time, in terms of industry, the development of new industries , affected by the development of organic and natural living towns, drives the reform of industrial structure. For example, the concept of organic natural living town strengthens the demand for various public transport motor vehicles, which greatly promotes the development of motor vehicle industry of public transportation. In the mean time, with the development of organic natural life, the return of urban population and the overall improvement of living facilities, it will be greatly conducive to the second prosperity of urban commerce caused by urban rejuvenation, the development of urban logistics, public transport, parking facilities and related industries driven by the improvement of organic natural life, such as tourism, public transport, parking facility industries, which, from another level, has greatly promoted the development of emerging industries. What is more important is the prominent effect of organic natural living towns on public benefits and sustainable development, and such public benefits can still finally feed back to each resident from the perspective of macro and long-term development.
|
